AARO Historical Record Report, Vol. 1
AARO's March 2024 review of US government UAP involvement since 1945 found 'no empirical evidence' that any UAP sighting was extraterrestrial technology.
2024 CE · 38.87, -77.06 · status: official
The account
Required by Congress, the report reviewed past programmes from Sign to AATIP, and interviewed people who had made reverse-engineering claims. It concluded that many such stories came from circular reporting among a small group of believers, and from misidentified secret programmes. It also revealed 'Kona Blue', a rejected proposal for a secret programme to exploit recovered craft.
The sceptical view
Critics including David Grusch's supporters and some members of Congress said AARO didn't interview key witnesses or get access to all programmes. A second volume was promised.
Connections in the atlas
- AARO Historical Record Report, Vol. 1
- Harry Reid: Told the New Yorker: "I was told for decades that Lockheed h
- Kona Blue
- AARO Historical Record Report, Volume 1
- ? Can ball lightning explain UFO reports?
- ▶ The government UFO files
- David Grusch: Testified under oath that the US runs a decades-long program
- FY2024 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP
- AARO director's Senate testimony
- Pentagon UFO disinformation revealed
- Jon Kosloski
- FY2023 NDAA: AARO in law & whistleblower route